Hall Booth Smith, P.C.

Trey uses his extensive trial experience and problem solving skills to provide clients in the long-term care setting with the guidance and analysis necessary to navigate litigation which is often complicated by statutory and regulatory hazards and voluminous document production. While few long term cases see a court room, attorneys suing Trey’s clients know that if the case is not resolved, there is a more than capable trial lawyer on the other side who will offer a formidable defense before a jury.

Employing a team approach, Trey works closely with his associates, paralegals and facility management to develop and present the most favorable defense in cases involving allegations of falls, ulcers, abuse and neglect, and failure to thrive in both assisted living and skilled nursing facilities.

Before he tried his first case as a young associate in a court of unlimited jurisdiction, Trey had “ghost written” legal opinions on a wide variety of insurance coverage issues for his supervising insurance-defense-based litigation partners. Over the years, Trey earned the trust and confidence of multiple insurance carriers to deliver timely and comprehensive analyses of difficult coverage questions arising under automobile and commercial general liability insurance policies.

Of course, writing a coverage opinion is one thing; defending the coverage decision and/or pursuing a declaratory judgment in court is another thing altogether. Given his extensive courtroom experience, Trey has the knowledge and ability to file the appropriate legal action on behalf of an insurance client and litigate the coverage issue through verdict and the appellate courts.

Trey’s work in the employment litigation field has generally concerned state law claims such as breach of employment contracts, breach of non-competition clauses, wrongful termination, and the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act. He has argued a non-compete case before the South Carolina Supreme Court and a Payment of Wages Act claim before the Court of Appeals.

Trey uses his litigation experience to provide general counsel legal services to a locally based, national sign company on employment issues, all designed to eliminate costly litigation involved with hiring, retention, and termination decisions.

Retail and hospitality is near and dear to Trey’s litigation heart. Who would have predicted that as a lawyer, he would have the opportunity and privilege to represent the same quick service restaurant corporation that he flipped burgers for as a teenager? Of course, Trey has represented a much broader spectrum of clients in the retail and hospitality industry on claims ranging from slip-and-falls to negligent security, to indemnity claims between retailer and supplier/manufacturer.

He has defended property owners of retail strip malls and apartment complexes for injury claims allegedly the result of an assortment of defective conditions, and he has defended bar and restaurant owners in dram shop cases (alleged inappropriate service of alcohol) and negligent security cases (assaults and batteries). In one case, Trey obtained a defense jury verdict for a pizza restaurant that allegedly served a pizza with glass baked into it (and consumed by a child). In another recent case, Trey defended an apartment complex owner following the unfortunate death of a seven year old child in the complex’s pool. These are just a few examples of the kinds of cases that Trey’s retail and hospitality clients have entrusted the defense of throughout his litigation career.

Since the beginning of his litigation career, Trey has been a member of larger, multi-practice law firms that have been “go-to” firms for products liability cases. Consequentially, Trey has had the opportunity to represent multiple clients in defense of alleged defective design, manufacturing, and instruction claims. In a recent case, Trey obtained a complete defense jury verdict for a multi-national personal care product company in an alleged defective manufacture and design of an ethnic hair care product. He then successfully defended the verdict before the South Carolina Court of Appeals.

Just prior to that case, Trey obtained a nuisance value settlement for a regional garage door manufacturer in an alleged defective design and instructions case. Trey acknowledges and readily accepts the responsibility of a products liability case by spending the time and effort to learn and know the client’s product as well as the client.

While Trey’s litigation practice has become multi-faceted over the years, the practice area that has remained a constant has been motor vehicle liability and insurance law. From the smallest property damage wreck case to the most substantial multi-fatality trucking accident case and difficult insurance coverage issues, Trey has successfully represented individuals and corporations in front of judges and juries at all trial court levels.

Trey has the ability to take on the toughest liability and medical causation questions presented in motor vehicle accident cases, using his trial experience to identify when, and which, skilled experts in fields such as accident reconstruction, biomechanics, and medical specialties should be retained in any particular case.

Because the geographic footprint of his practice extends across the state, Trey regularly advises and counsels clients on the peculiarities of venues in which motor vehicle liability cases may be filed and ultimately tried. Simply stated, Trey has the experience and depth of knowledge to manage any motor vehicle liability and insurance law case that might be encountered in South Carolina.