Dan Addison

Having grown up in a dentist’s household, Dan learned early about the challenges facing those in the field. His father was a dentist for four decades in Columbia, South Carolina, and was an officer of the South Carolina Dental Association. Dan worked for his father’s office throughout high school and college and absorbed a great deal of knowledge about patient care from his father during those years. Based on his three decades of courtroom experience and a lifetime of being surrounded by dentistry, Dan can provide a knowledge-based defense of dental practitioners in cases brought against them.

Dan is no stranger to the life of a services member. Having grown up with a father that served in the Army Medical Corps and a brother who served for 30 years in the Air Force, service is part of his family fabric. Dan himself signed a contract to be a Naval Aviator, and he understands the sacrifices made by our service members.

Dan’s brother contracted a very rare form of cancer which was traced to exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds during service in Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert Storm. Dan was successful in helping his brother and his brother’s dependents pursue a VA disability claim for his cancer. The involvement in this very personal case lead Dan to help other Veteran’s with similar claims, including other members of his brother’s unit in Desert Storm.

When the Camp LeJeune Justice Act was under consideration, one of Dan’s lifelong friend’s led the Governmental Affairs team that pushed the bill through congress. That friend often “ran the traps” with Dan on the matters with bill before congress. With this experience, and per the involvement with his brother’s case, along with his 30 years of handling toxic exposure cases, Dan determined to help veterans and their dependents in claims against the Camp LeJeune Justice Act.

Dan has been litigating in the health care field for 30 years. He has represented a variety of health care entities, including hospitals, physician practice groups, physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and other licensed personnel in medical malpractice litigation. His experience also includes defending clients in claims of alleged negligent care and treatment, negligent misdiagnosis, and lack of consent from the pre-suit stage through resolution.

Dan has three decades of experience litigating complex workers’ compensation cases. He defends corporations and other employers in claims involving alleged exposure to hazardous substances unique to the claimant’s workplace and represents clients in other high-risk occupational exposure claims.

Dan is widely recognized and respected for his authoritative knowledge of occupational disease and related matters, and he is often invited to speak on panels and address professional gatherings about emerging issues and other matters of importance around workers’ compensation law. He also counsels clients on health care workers’ compensation disputes and trucking workers’ compensation cases and handles subrogation cases to help strategically manage risk, including claims involving workers’ compensation issues.

One of Dan’s most notable successes was the precedent-setting Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation lawsuit, 394 S.C. 428, 716 S.E. 2d 443 (2011), in which the claimant sought compensation for asbestosis allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos and other chemicals when he was employed at a Westinghouse manufacturing plant. Skinner later left that job to take a higher paying position with the National Guard. The South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission awarded Skinner a lump sum of $119,000, and upon appeal, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that asbestosis and other pulmonary disease cases were not compensable under the scheduled loss provisions and were only compensable if the claimant’s wage loss was proven.