Navigating the Updated OCR Guidance on Online Tracking Technologies: Key Insights

Introduction

The digital health landscape is evolving and with it, the regulatory framework that governs the use of online tracking technologies by health care entities. The recent update issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) on March 18, 2024, revised the initial guidance from December 1, 2022, providing clearer directives for HIPAA covered entities and business associates regarding the deployment of online tracking tools.

This update is pivotal for online businesses in the health care sector, aiming to align their operations with HIPAA regulations while leveraging digital analytics for enhanced service delivery.

What are Tracking Technology Tools?

Online tracking technology tools are software solutions used to collect, analyze, and store data on how users interact with websites, mobile applications, and digital advertisements. These tools play a crucial role in understanding user behavior, improving website performance, optimizing user experience, and personalizing content and advertisements.

Common Types

Here’s an overview of the most common types of online tracking technologies:

• Cookies: Small text files stored on a user’s device when they visit a website. They track and remember users’ actions and preferences, such as login details, language, and font sizes over time, making subsequent visits more efficient. Cookies can be “first-party,” set by the site the user is visiting, or “third-party,” set by a domain other than the one the user is visiting, often used for advertising and analytics.
• Web Beacons (Pixel Tags): Tiny, invisible images embedded in emails and web pages. They track users’ behavior, such as whether an email was opened or if a web page was visited. They’re often used in conjunction with cookies to understand how users interact with the content.
• Fingerprinting: Gathers information from a user’s device, such as screen resolution, operating system, and browser type, to create a unique identifier for that user. This technique can track users across different websites without relying on cookies, making it harder for users to avoid tracking.
• Session Replay Scripts: Capture and replay a user’s interactions on a website, such as clicks, scrolls, and keystrokes. This tool is useful for understanding user experience and identifying usability issues on a site.
• Tracking Pixels: Similar to web beacons, are tiny images inserted into emails, websites, and ads. They notify the sender when the content is viewed. Tracking pixels are extensively used in digital marketing to measure the effectiveness of advertising campaigns and understand user engagement.

Concerns

While these technologies offer significant benefits in terms of personalized user experiences and efficient advertising, they also raise privacy concerns.

Regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States mandate strict guidelines on how personal data can be collected, processed, and stored. Businesses must ensure compliance with these regulations by obtaining consent from users, providing clear privacy notices, and offering options to opt out of tracking.

Prior Guidance Overview

Originally, the OCR emphasized the stringent handling of protected health information (PHI) when utilizing tracking technologies like Google Analytics or Meta Pixel. PHI encompasses a wide array of individually identifiable health data, extending to IP addresses and social security numbers. The initial guidance prompted a wave of operational adjustments among regulated entities and also sparked legal challenges and concerns.

2024 Update: Clarity & Compliance

The recent update maintains much of the original guidance but introduces several critical clarifications:

• Revised Scope of PHI: The update delineates that not all instances where tracking technologies connect user activities to health-related web content necessarily amount to the handling of PHI, particularly if the user’s visit isn’t directly tied to their personal health matters.
• Unauthenticated Webpages: It clarifies that generally, unauthenticated webpages (those not requiring user login) do not access PHI. However, exceptions exist as illustrated by the scenarios provided in the guidance, highlighting the nuanced approach required to determine PHI involvement.
• Examples and Requirements for Compliance: New examples, including the use of mobile apps for health management, underscore the situations where disclosure to tracking vendors could constitute PHI handling. Moreover, the necessity for Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) with vendors to ensure HIPAA compliance is emphasized.
• Enforcement Focus: The OCR declares its intention to prioritize HIPAA Security Rule compliance in its oversight of online tracking practices.

Strategies for Compliance

For online businesses in the healthcare domain, navigating the updated OCR guidance involves a multifaceted strategy:

• Transparency: Identify the use of tracking technologies on the entity’s website or mobile app’s privacy policy, notice, or terms and conditions of use.
• Review and Adjust Tracking Practices: Entities must closely examine their use of tracking technologies, especially in scenarios where user interaction could imply health-related inquiries or activities, to ensure PHI is not impermissibly disclosed.
• Clarify Vendor Relationships: Establishing clear, HIPAA-compliant BAAs with technology vendors is crucial. If a vendor refuses to comply, alternatives must be sought, including potentially de-identifying PHI before analysis or obtaining explicit user authorization.
• Focus on Security Rule Compliance: Given OCR’s enforcement priority, entities must rigorously apply the HIPAA Security Rule, ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI across digital platforms.
• Legal and Regulatory Vigilance: Stay informed of legal challenges and potential regulatory shifts. Current litigation suggests the possibility of future changes to OCR’s guidance.

Conclusion

While the OCR’s 2024 update on online tracking technologies reaffirms much of its earlier guidance, the clarifications provided are significant for HIPAA-covered entities and business associates. They underscore the need for a careful, informed approach to using digital analytics in healthcare.

Compliance is not just about adhering to regulations; it’s about safeguarding patient privacy and trust in an increasingly digital world. As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, staying abreast of updates and adapting operations accordingly will be key for online businesses in the healthcare sector.

Disclaimer

This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Hall Booth Smith, P.C. and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.